Instapundit

has this quote:

"So let’s get this straight: we are going to see more than $4 trillion in new spending, have a big tax increase, and defund our military — while certain to face international challenges where 'it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.' And this is what Democrats are saying?"

Let me point out that even those that want something for nothing or for the U.S. to be substantially if not entirely weakened on the world stage are expressing a global and human patriotism...so don't criticize them or in any way threaten their ascendancy, or you're a bigot and part of the problem.

And never question their efficiency, or aspirations to efficiency, for the reasons stated above.

Also, well just read Gatewaypundit.

Anyone who pretends they did not know he was corrupt and owed favors when they pulled the lever has little to back up the claim.

"Glenn:

It's the exact opposite of 'buying' the White House, and it's far worse. It's "selling" the White House, mortgaging it to a crazy quilt of private greed and power-grabbing. Obama is accumulating a long list of undisclosed debts to interest groups and indivduals, that he is supposed to pay off with government money and regulatory manipulation once in power. These debts are concealed from the public, and for good reason -- the public's benefit is not the purpose of these future reckonings. McCain has foresworn going into the White House with a secret agenda -- Obama may win BECAUSE he has such a secret agenda. If McCain's campaign does not make this point in ads on the TV channels hosting Obama's half-hour pre-election special, before and after that half-hour, it's another reason he deserves to lose. That the mainstream media declines to point this out on their own air time is -- well, to be expected.

Glenn, please don't use my name, only (if you can) identify me as a major news media employee whose company is facing major budget cuts, who doesn't want to give grounds for being one item on the budget cut list."