Here is an article in the Economist which anyone with a portion of thinking matter may fisk and quite easily.
Essentially the writer believes that "Tea-Partiers" fetishize the Constitution to a degree which is incompatible with modern realities and that they have their histories and contemporary pragmatisms completely in error.
The comments are amusing.
I did like this one.
The author of the article is clearly too self-worshiping to feel uncomfortable at the witness of his own febrile reasoning and public beclowning.